Tyranny vs Anarchy
Sat, Sep 11 2010 05:21 PM
Fascism = Big centralized government with central planning for the perfecting of the master-race.
Marx believed in the same thing. before Marx there was Godwin who equally believed in solution based governing for the perfecting of the human race. They viewed man as a perfectible creature that is not limited by natural tendencies.
The Founders and Adam Smith believed otherwise that man has limitations and that those limitations will always be a part of us.
I can't speak for the big-government republicans but I can speak on the behalf of individualism.
The accurate paradigm that should be remembered was the paradigm of the Founders….
Tyranny vs Anarchy
Tyranny is big centralized government where individuals are ruled and do not have individual freedoms to life liberty or property.
Anarchy is the absence of government.
The founders believed being in the middle of that paradigm. Small limited central government so that individuals are not under the yoke of tyranny but big enough to have power to take care of the needs of the States.
Overtime the people and the political class have forgotten this paradigm for expediency sake. Because the natural tendency of any nation is the increase the size the government. It is not solely the fault of the progressive big government types, it is also the fault of us as citizens to keep a watch on the government. The government is our creation, thus a creature of man, man is not a creature of government.
The only good thing about the current regime being in power is that it is igniting the fire of liberty in the hearts and minds of the citizens. It is sad that we had to wake up under these circumstances, but never the less another period of Awakening is happening among liberty loving people. Time will only tell if it lasts and if we as a citizenry are serious about taking back the power from the State and returning it to the people where it rightly belongs.
Getting back to the topic at hand. Fascism, Communism or Socialism are all on the side of tyranny because those "-isms" tend to rob man of individual freedom. It is inaccurate to align libertarian type people with fascism because these types of people believe in the very opposite of what Fascism stands for.
js-comments
I have a right to your magical abilites!
Thu, Mar 18 2010 07:01 AM
| Healthcare
I am sorry healthcare is a right? That's like me calling godaddy telling them that they better provide me with hosting service because I have a right to their service.
What's next, education, housing? Before you know it we will be in the alleged marxist utopian of communism.
Rights transcend time. Rights do not evolve they are constants of the human race. If healthcare is a right then that right would extend to every age of human existence.
Yes medieval doctor please bleed me because I have a right to it. Yes african witch doctor please heal me from this evil spirit possessing my body because I have a right to your magical abilities. Healthcare is not a right, it is a service provided by another individual. I do not have the right to plunder goods and services from my follow man.
What's next, education, housing? Before you know it we will be in the alleged marxist utopian of communism.
Rights transcend time. Rights do not evolve they are constants of the human race. If healthcare is a right then that right would extend to every age of human existence.
Yes medieval doctor please bleed me because I have a right to it. Yes african witch doctor please heal me from this evil spirit possessing my body because I have a right to your magical abilities. Healthcare is not a right, it is a service provided by another individual. I do not have the right to plunder goods and services from my follow man.
js-comments
Responding to a comment at Foxnews
Sun, Feb 21 2010 01:53 AM
readatextbooksays:
Actually Glenn Beck lies quite often: He said that no other President had never been sworn into office without a Bible. He said he 'checked'. John Qunicy Adams used a law book. Franklin Pierce didn't even swear. He affirmed. Teddy Roosevelt used no Bible. Several Presidents kissed a Bible but did not swear on one. He knows most people don't have the time to check his "facts" so he gets away with it. I checked, He lied
Sunday, February 21, 2010 at 1:16 AM
@readatextbooksays:
That's it that's all you have to condemn Beck and his address, that he got one of his historical facts wrong. You say he lies 'often' please give me more examples of 'often' and let them be a bigger deal than if a president put his hand on the bible or not, how on earth does that derail the message of Natural Law and Personal Liberty that Beck is expressing to people. You don't seem to have a lot of content in your criticism of Beck, the only thing you have is a personal attack which shows how weak your case really is. Please confound us with some Marxist dogma and prove us wrong on those grounds, screw attacking the messenger please attack the message and do so with a little credibility
js-comments